Key result
Analysis of ECG data using ordinal partition transition networks revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean degree between healthy patients and those with varying heart conditions.
Observational
Ordinal partition transition networks, specifically the mean degree measure, can significantly differentiate between ECGs of healthy individuals and those with various heart conditions.
May aid ECG differentiation of cardiac conditions; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before clinical consideration.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) data from patients with a variety of heart conditions are studied using ordinal pattern partition networks. The ordinal pattern partition networks are formed from the ECG time series by symbolizing the data into ordinal patterns. The ordinal patterns form the nodes of the network and edges are defined through the time ordering of the ordinal patterns in the symbolized time series. A network measure, called the mean degree, is computed from each time series-generated network. In addition, the entropy and number of non-occurring ordinal patterns (NFP) is computed for each series. The distribution of mean degrees, entropies, and NFPs for each heart condition studied is compared. A statistically significant difference between healthy patients and several groups of unhealthy patients with varying heart conditions is found for the distributions of the mean degrees, unlike for any of the distributions of the entropies or NFPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kulp et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart conditions. Ordinal pattern partition networks analysis of ECG data vs. Healthy patients was evaluated on Distributions of mean degrees, entropies, and number of non-occurring ordinal patterns (NFP). Analysis of ECG data using ordinal partition transition networks revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean degree between healthy patients and those with varying heart conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: