Introduction Lipodystrophy was first described in HIV-1-infected patients in 1998 [1–5]. The main clinical feature is subcutaneous fat loss or lipoatrophy of the face, limbs, and buttocks [6,7]. Patients can also experience fat accumulation within the abdomen, neck or breasts [8,9]. The pathogenesis of lipoatrophy appears to be multifactorial. Contributing factors are CD4+ lymphocyte cell count, HIV clinical stage, race, sex, exercise level, age at start of antiretroviral therapy [8], and the rapidity of its onset may depend on the individual total fat mass. The driving force behind lipoatrophy is undoubtedly the cumulative exposure to thymidine analogue drugs. These drugs, in particular stavudine and to a lesser extent zidovudine, block mitochondrial DNA polymerase function producing apoptosis of fat cells [9,10]. Earlier detection and treatment of HIV infection [11], as well as the use of antiretroviral drugs with less deleterious effects on body fat, make it reasonable to hypothesize a decrease in prevalence of lipodystrophy in the coming years. Facial lipoatrophy is characterized by loss of the buccal and/or temporal fat pads, leading to facial skeletonization with concave cheeks, prominent naso-labial folds, periorbital hollowing, and visible facial musculature [10–12]. A volume deficit of this type will alter the youthful, healthy, convex curves of the face into aged, pathologic, concave contours [13–16]. Facial fat depletion may occur within the first year of treatment [15] and the risk increases along with cumulative exposure to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [16]. Patients with HIV-associated lipoatrophy have a fairly rapid and localized loss of facial soft tissue, unlike the slower loss of facial fullness associated with aging [17]. Facial lipoatrophy is a stigmatizing feature of HIV-related lipodystrophy. Facial appearance is usually perceived as a manifestation of health and cannot be hidden behind clothes. Studies have demonstrated the negative psychosocial impact and impairment of quality of life (QoL) from lipodystrophy due to erosion of self-image and self-esteem, demoralization and depression, problems in social and sexual relations [18,19]. In addition, lipodystrophy often may result in HIV disclosure [20]. Several studies have demonstrated the potential for reversibility of lipoatrophy by switching from stavudine or zidovudine to thymidine analogue-sparing regimens, although improvement in subcutaneous fat is slow and incomplete [21–23]. Initial promising data on the beneficial effects of certain drugs such as rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, pravastatin or uridine on lipoatrophy has been either inconclusive or unconfirmed [24–27]. For this reason, as in other acquired or congenital lipoatrophies, plastic surgery seems to be up to now the mainstay of treatment, offering either lipofilling, or biodegradable, or nonbiodegradable filler injections. Search strategies and selected criteria Data to review were identified by protocolized searches through MEDLINE, references from relevant articles, and abstract books of the first nine International Workshops on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy. Search terms were ‘Lipodystrophy’, ‘HIV’, and ‘Plastic surgery’. Studies reported in the English language only were included. We aimed at providing an updated comprehensive knowledge of the surgical approaches for reconstruction of HIV-related facial lipoatrophy. We specifically looked for criteria to qualify for surgery, to choose among surgical interventions, to identify clinical outcomes and to manage side effects. Indications for surgical treatment of HIV-related face lipoatrophy Severity of facial lipoatrophy The severity of facial lipoatrophy is probably the most important issue to qualify for surgical treatment. However, assessment of HIV facial lipoatrophy is not easy. Objective methods have occasionally been used, but the measurement of facial fat is challenging [28,29]. Up to now there is neither a standardized available tool to measure facial pad thickness, nor clear facial reference points that could be of use in the clinical setting. In an attempt to standardize lipoatrophy severity, a photo comparison grading scale has been proposed and utilized. James et al.[30] suggested to consider a four-stage severity scale. Degree 1 is defined as a minimal fat wasting of the cheeks only, and slight enhancement of the naso-labial folds. Degree 2 refers to moderate fat wasting of the cheeks, obvious enhancement of the naso-labial folds and appearance of ‘naso-labial bands’. Degree 3 is characterized by moderate fat wasting of cheeks and temporal regions with prominent naso-labial folds (naso-labial bands), and in degree 4 there is severe fat wasting and hollowing of cheeks, temporal, and periocular regions, resulting in visible facial bony prominences [31]. Fontdevila et al.[32], more recently, suggested to consider a three-degree severity scale only (mild, moderate, severe) and was able to validate a new photo comparison grading scale with objective volume measurement obtained by CT scan. Fig. 1 represents these pictures currently used both at Modena Metabolic Clinic (Italy) and at Barcelona Hospital Clinic (Spain) as comparison references. The main difference between these classification system concerns degree 1 alias ‘mild facial lipoatrophy’. Patients with malar flattening, but no noticeable nasolabial folds are included in this category. Plastic surgery is usually offered to patients presenting with moderate to severe facial lipoatrophy.Fig. 1: Classification of facial lipoatrophy in clinical stages and picture comparison.Psychological repercussion of facial lipoatrophy Psychological repercussion is another characteristic that may qualify for surgical treatment. Psychometric inclusion criteria take into account psychological consequences of lipodystrophy by examining body image perception by means of the ‘Assessment of Body Change and Distress Questionnaire’ especially conceived to analyse perceptions, attitudes, feelings, emotions, actions and satisfactions concerning body appearance and functioning [33,34]. This is an extremely useful tool, as some patients with a mild to moderate face lipoatrophy may experience a deep detriment of body image perception, whereas others with a more severe form could have the psychological resources to better cope with this condition. Treatment efficacy has predominantly been assessed subjectively by clinicians and patients, either by nonstandardized photography, or radiological tools, mainly ultrasound and CT scan [35–38]. It should be stressed that the buccal fat pad has a minor role in the facial appearance and does not have a concrete area in superficial anatomy. For this reason, ultrasound evaluation of the cheek is a controversial end point in plastic facial reconstruction surgery. Surgical treatment of HIV-related face lipoatrophy Surgical interventions can be summarized as follows: autologous fat transplantation (AFT) [39–41], and injections of biodegradable [hyaluronic acid, poly-L-lactic acid (PLA), hydroxyapatites] [42–45] or nonbiodegradable [silicon, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyacrylamide hydrogel, polyalkylimide) gel fillers [46]. The classification refers exclusively to the biological proprieties of these materials. They do not necessary correlate with the durability of the aesthetic results. For example PLA and hydroxyapatites consist of particles that are slowly degraded, but the bulk of the tissue fibrosis, they provoke, is permanent. It is possible to use in time sequence in the same anatomical site different re-absorbable materials considering their biodegradability, whereas it is absolutely advised not to mix in the same site absorbable and nonabsorbable fillers. Autologous fat transplantation Autologous fat transplantation allows the harvesting of a small intact lump (parcel) of fatty tissue that can be processed to remove nonviable components and simultaneously avoid mechanical trauma or exposure. Utilizing strict sterile procedures the fat is injected through a cannula to ensure intimate tissue incorporation and thus limit migration. There are different phases of AFT as initially reported by Coleman [39–41]. Harvesting: A clinical or ultrasound evaluation is made to define the presence of subcutaneous fat in the abdomen, pubis, male breast, thoracic-dorsal and dorso-cervical region. Local or general anaesthesia or deep sedation is provided after discussing with the patient and considering his clinical conditions. Ringer's lactate with 1: 1 000 000 of epinephrine and 50 ml of 2% lidocaine every 1 l of Ringer's lactate, if local anaesthesia is used, is infiltrated bluntly through a stab incision prior to harvesting. The harvesting device is a 10-ml disposable Luer-lock syringe attached to a two-holed blunt cannula. The entry portal of the cannula is just large enough to allow passage of fatty tissue parcels of a size that will pass through the lumen of the tip of the Luer-lock syringe. To limit the vacuum to a minimum negative pressure, suction is hand-applied by slowly withdrawing the plunger of the 10-ml syringe in a gradual manner. The harvesting relies on the curetting action as well as the suctioning. Transfer and purification: The harvesting cannula is disconnected from the Luerlock and replaced by a cap. The plunger of the syringe is then removed, and the capped 10-ml syringe is placed into a sterilization sleeve in a sterilized central rotor of a centrifuge, which spins it at about 3000 r.p.m. for 3 or 4 min. The aspirated subcutaneous material separates into three basic layers: a top layer composed primarily of oil from ruptured fat cells; a bottom layer, composed almost entirely of blood, lidocaine and Ringer's lactate; and a middle layer of primarily usable fat tissue. The top oily layer is decanted, the dense lower layer is drained, and the remaining fat parcels are transferred in to a 1-ml Luer-lock syringe. Placement: The fat placement is performed using an 18-gauge cannula with an ejection aperture close to the closed distal end. The ejection portal is just large enough to allow passage of the fat parcels. The intact parcels are forced out of the ejection aperture by depressing the plunger on the infiltrating syringe. The size, shape and internal finish of the cannula are designed to reduce clogging and trauma to the parcels of fatty tissue. The distal end is blunt in order to reduce the risk of haematoma, nerve damage, and perforation of nontargeted tissue. The cannula initially creates tunnels inside the recipient tissue, and as it is withdrawn, the plunger of the syringe is depressed in a controlled manner so that a minuscule amount of the refined tissue (usually less than1/8 of a millilitre) is placed evenly over the length of the tunnel. Only a minimal positive pressure is ever placed on the plunger of the infiltration syringe. For 8–12 h postoperatively, cold compresses or ice packs are applied continuously on the infiltrated sites. The patient can be discharged after 2 h if local anaesthesia with sedation has been used and after 8–24 h following general anaesthesia. Apart from the operative risks the only identified complication described has been the facial fat hypertrophy at the same time of recurrence of fat hypertrophy in the harvest site [47]. Biodegradable synthetic gel fillers Biodegradable synthetically produced gel fillers used in HIV-related facial lipoatrophy include cross-linked hyaluronic acid, PLA and hydroxyapatite gel [42–45]. Hyaluronic acid gel Native hyaluronic acid is a normal polysaccharide component of mammalian soft tissues. The type of hyaluronic acid, which in gel form is injected into human tissues, has been molecularly modified – mainly by increasing cross-linkage to delay degradation – and this product, a homogenous polymer hydrogel, is FDA-approved for the treatment of wrinkles. Enzymatic degradation is delayed and the filling effect increased, both thanks to the Hyaluronic acid gel was to in a by of the and to be more the and well Hyaluronic acid has been used to HIV facial but large of material are necessary to an and the filling effect for a of In general the are to for but in a small of with HIV were ml into the malar aesthetic were only reported through acid gel acid is in normal so that it can be by tissue The gel of of acid and a and it has been by the for use in HIV-associated lipoatrophy The the tissue to a body which the and fat tissue to and this is for the filling The gel is usually injected in resulting in different stages of the tissue injected in it a of the can be with other filling in the temporal area are less in the buccal The material is are but occur and are the most complication due to this PLA is and over which time a gradual tissue is Treatment is in with of leading to a gradual in facial experience with PLA has strategies have been suggested to reduce the risk of and avoid the potential These volume used at injections placed in the subcutaneous into the time between patient hydroxyapatite gel on hydroxyapatite in gel were FDA-approved for injections and for use as in a of surgery This product, has also been used for treatment of and acid is a component of normal and the is over years. In on patients was to be an and well treatment for face lipoatrophy and to is to be the same as for acid as the of the gel is Up to now these have only been reported after into but the material is new for aesthetic and the of risk to be synthetic fillers fillers include gel polyacrylamide hydrogel, and gel Several of oil are FDA-approved for but the gel is also used in the The for Plastic has the use of for as of experience with this material have that it may to up to after the occasionally with side effect of oil is its to tissue in in is but has no for HIV lipoatrophy. The in the is within a but the presence of the new in that same just as it for the acid and the hydroxyapatite gel has been used in for close to a and is available in other as A large in described its use in HIV-associated but in this the were in of and a clear of data was side effects included and but the references about with the use of fillers in particular data from this an of thickness, which up to is an highly sterile which is used for into soft tissues. It of cross-linked polyacrylamide and and is in a disposable 1-ml syringe that is used to into the subcutaneous in a manner. This in small which are into the tissue has been in use in for more and clinical studies on patients with HIV lipoatrophy have been out in and with up to of or have been The only were which were with of the treatment and gel of a in patients between 2 and injections every were a aesthetic of this material for the of the facial lipoatrophy with gel polyacrylamide an synthetic on and of The gel is an which the tissue to form a the that is to migration. In to polyacrylamide gel it is injected in as a large which it in of or infection However, in clinical have a of patients with of the material from the cheek to the after the the gel has the same as the tissue, to the but over time it can and studies of and HIV patients with this gel have been with a from 1 to years. include and the up to after the Adverse associated to surgical filling are well but are associated with the risk of both and delayed Reactions can be to the or the filling are up to after but they are usually and of a minor These are predominantly and include site such as and site include haematoma, by infection or tissue can occur to after the on the gel filler used delayed include or or and of A infection due to within the gel is for the polymer acid polyacrylamide This will within 2 of the However, if 1 or 2 ml of gel is injected as it may and the the infection the the risk is for the to form a within the a treatment may be if the infection but if there is no within 3 the gel should be and the the same the infection has are A is to but this is not treatment may of and the infection or if there are surgical of the gel is the only In of or due to of or gel may be This should be in a a to 2 h prior to the and may be through treatment or plastic surgery are after with gel and with such as PLA and The behind the of these up to after the is a degradation of or in their that localized Several polymerase and have to identify the presence of within these Treatment are injections with or However, these have been less surgery or in these body different are for the different and these are not to their life time within the tissue, but to their of with tissue. The polymer acid, polyacrylamide and are as which are to the tissue by The body to these is The that PLA and are or within the tissue. The gel has and body cells and In of the most are the of polymer as of that PLA and as or within the tissue. infection is as an body with and cells as well as the presence of and infection is as an body with and cells as well as the presence of and is as a tissue – – cells and cells and of as well tissue – possible – cells and experience and data 1 clinical experience in surgical of facial lipoatrophy. It is studies have assessed efficacy and durability of these interventions and only studies have different surgical approaches The first was at the Metabolic Clinic of Modena and with enough subcutaneous fat were offered to the other were to different surgical a of PLA or injections every 4 The end point was the measurement of the cheek by the result of and subcutaneous end points included body image evaluation facial aesthetic and aesthetic and by PLA and a of and the in fat was and for PLA and The in result was in the AFT as the only difference in were in the AFT patients facial fat hypertrophy at the same time of recurrence of fat hypertrophy in the harvest This clinical picture has been as [47]. This have no more been the use of fat hypertrophy for harvest site has been three were highly in the aesthetic of the 1: clinical experience in surgical of facial by et in a the clinical efficacy of facial with autologous fat, acid, and polyacrylamide using clinical and facial as well as patient and Patients were included and in the and almost of the patients moderate or severe facial but at only in these patients from the A new of at was necessary in of patients and in the and were with of the and in three with or have to be an and well to facial at up to were for of severity and between provided the A of this was the of the in the three treatment end points is challenging for studies of facial fillers by different by may not to and is and the of antiretroviral may also aesthetic of three different surgery using and of comparison have been and for data is It is necessary to consider outcomes such as the assessment of body aesthetic perception, and outcomes of plastic surgery for treatment of facial lipoatrophy have been described by et in an of after an AFT PLA injections to cheek only PLA only surgery been to the face, patients reported body image improvement the no or to facial lipoatrophy. This positive effect been in the and in the PLA and whereas it no in the AFT It should be that patients with AFT use to be patients with form so they were more to psychological that the facial was only a of their of the most of surgery been on as assessed by the the in a improvement in the the by surgery the been in the PLA and only of three different surgical and after the most surgical The most important to the is the of the plastic These are the and the only to autologous fat the aesthetic result of lipofilling, and both biodegradable and nonbiodegradable fillers the of the surgical is not a of aesthetic Biodegradable a a lower of effects to main is and the for to aesthetic over time which increases treatment Biodegradable fillers are there is potential for of the which the for HIV facial thymidine analogue-sparing are These fillers should be the first in of mild to moderate facial in order to allow a better of the filler with the aging 4 facial lipoatrophy is This can be obtained mainly with or with nonbiodegradable fillers. In of patients often from or severe or or nonbiodegradable fillers should be of the risk of local infection or that may occur after the filling as be in patients with synthetic materials will a treatment. mainly by local infection and are fillers are injected with and but they may occur with fillers. There may be different in may these and these the on the different In general it can be that is most but it may to a less in comparison to the of surgical procedures for facial and in particular with biodegradable filler that most of the time A for the patient with the use of AFT is the treatment of fat accumulation that can this 2 clinical to be into account different surgical Patients be about the that their and to the of material will be used in his or criteria of surgical treatment of HIV-associated facial Facial lipoatrophy is a stigmatizing feature of HIV-related lipodystrophy. if hypothesize that its prevalence is to decrease with the of the new drugs, it for patients a of self-image and and have been made to but the are slow and Plastic surgery seems to be a well tool to HIV-related face lipoatrophy. It has to be in the psychological consequences of and in are available injections of absorbable or nonabsorbable with in about and durability of the aesthetic results. The of the to be used on the face lipoatrophy severity, on the of subcutaneous fat and on the different of these procedures in the risk of to face surgery so that the of the the plastic in these is highly controlled be to define the and of the different surgical to HIV-related face lipoatrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guaraldi et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: