Why the study?
Does virtual real-time digital filtering improve the accuracy of hemodynamic data compared to analog filtering during right heart catheterization?
Does virtual real-time digital filtering improve the accuracy of hemodynamic data compared to analog filtering during right heart catheterization?
Virtual real-time digital filtering of hemodynamic data during right heart catheterization improves data accuracy and reduces time delay compared to traditional analog filtering.
May support digital over analog filtering in right heart catheterization; leaves open prospective validation of accuracy and outcomes.
At present, the majority of cardiac catheterization laboratories acquire and store hemodynamic data in analog form. To examine the possibility of performing complex analysis of digital data during the catheterization procedure, we examined whether virtual real-time digital (fast Fourier) analysis improves the accuracy of clinical data. We compared digital filtering of fluid manometry during the right heart catheterization with 10-Hz and 250-Hz analog filters. Using the simultaneously acquired micromanometry as the "gold standard," we found that analog filtering is associated with a greater error and time delay than digital filtering. This study demonstrates that digital hemodynamic data analysis performed during cardiac catheterization can improve the quality of data obtained during right heart catheterization, with the results available within seconds. More extensive use of computers in the cardiac catheterization laboratory may be useful for both clinical and research purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corin et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: