Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate direct and indirect economic costs among private-sector employees with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Using a large US employer benefits database, we identified all employees with evidence of OA during calendar year 2007, and compared their costs of health care and work loss to age-and-sex-matched employees without evidence of OA in that year. RESULTS: Private-sector employees with OA (n = 2399) averaged 62.9 days of absenteeism versus 36.7 days among matched comparators (n = 2399) (P < 0.01). Mean total direct costs among these persons were $17,751 and $5057, respectively (P < 0.01); 34% of health care costs among persons with OA arose from medical encounters with listed diagnoses of OA. Mean total indirect costs were two-fold higher among persons with OA ($5002 versus $2120 for those without OA; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Private-sector employees with OA have higher direct and indirect costs than those without this condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: