Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nickel-rich cathode active materials (CAMs) and silicon-graphite composite anodes promise substantial lithium-ion battery (LIB) performance increases over state-of-the-art technologies. In order to compete with current LIB technologies, however, they must also be producible at a cost competitive with that of their predecessors. In this paper, full pouch cells based on state-of-the-art and prospective future CAMs are modeled using both graphite and silicon-graphite composite anodes to examine each technology's performance. Current open-market material costs are then utilized to estimate the costs of producing each cell. The two are then related to determine each cell's value on a USD kWh−1 basis. Future nickel-rich CAMs are shown to provide a strong performance advantage over current technologies, especially if their laboratory-scale performance can be replicated at a commercial scale. Silicon-graphite anodes likewise display performance gains, though these are shown to be highly dependent on cell chemistry and design. The collected current open-market prices of the materials needed to produce these technologies, however, are shown to be too high to result in a value improvement. Cost reductions necessary to achieve value parity with current technologies are thus calculated and possible future developments are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenwood et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: