Why the study?
Although inflammation drives coronary syndromes, pharmacological modification has yielded conflicting evidence, creating a need for guidance on assessing and treating inflammation in routine practice.
This ESC clinical consensus statement provides expert guidance on evaluating and managing inflammatory activity in patients with coronary syndromes in routine clinical practice.
Supports inflammation assessment in coronary syndromes; leaves open targeted therapies pending randomized validation.
Inflammation is a key driver of coronary syndromes across the continuum from chronic coronary syndromes to acute coronary syndromes. It contributes to atherogenesis, plaque destabilization, and ischaemic events and influences myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling. Inflammatory activity is further amplified by metabolic and autoimmune comorbidities such as diabetes, obesity, and connective tissue diseases, with obesity representing a major driver of chronic low-grade inflammation through adipose tissue dysfunction and cytokine activation, while psychosocial stress and environmental exposures including air pollution serve as additional triggers. Genetic variations, including human leucocyte antigen genotypes, modulate individual susceptibility to vascular inflammation and myocardial injury. This expert consensus from the European Society of Cardiology's Association for Acute CardioVascular Care summarizes the current understanding of inflammation across the full spectrum of coronary syndromes, including underlying mechanisms, relevant biomarkers, and imaging approaches that characterize vascular inflammation, and integrates insights from experimental and clinical studies. Importantly, this document provides explicit consensus-based guidance on when, how, and in whom inflammation should be assessed and treated in routine clinical practice. While the causal association between inflammation and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is well established, pharmacological modification of inflammation has produced conflicting evidence. Some agents, such as low-dose colchicine, have demonstrated modest reductions in cardiovascular events, although results across trials have been inconsistent. Other anti-inflammatory therapies have not shown clinical benefit, whereas selective cytokine inhibition with canakinumab has reduced cardiovascular risk at the cost of increased infection rates. The present manuscript also focuses on the evaluation of inflammatory activity in cardiovascular patients in routine clinical practice. It further discusses criteria for patient selection and clinical decision-making regarding the introduction of anti-inflammatory therapy in individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roubille et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary syndromes. Anti-inflammatory therapy was evaluated. This expert consensus statement provides guidance on assessing and treating inflammation in coronary syndromes, noting that while agents like colchicine and canakinumab reduce risk, evidence is mixed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: