Key result
During a fatiguing isometric handgrip task, men exhibited a significantly greater increase in relative mean arterial pressure than women (24.5% vs. 11.0%, p=0.03), with no difference in fatigability.
Why the study?
Women exhibit an attenuated exercise pressor reflex compared to men, but the influence of sex-specific mechanisms related to this reflex and performance fatigability remains to be fully elucidated.
Observational (n=24)
Absolute Event Rate: 24.5% vs 11%
p-value: p=.03
May inform sex-specific exercise BP monitoring; leaves open oxygenation's role in performance fatigability.
Women exhibit an attenuated exercise pressor reflex (EPR) when compared to men. The influence of sex-specific mechanisms related to the EPR and performance fatigability remain to be fully elucidated. The purpose was to determine the impact of oxygenation and metabolic efficiency on sex-specific performance fatigability and increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) resulting from a fatiguing isometric handgrip (IHG). Twenty-four adults volunteered to perform an IHG at 25% at maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs). Pre- and posttest MVICs were conducted to quantify performance fatigability. MAP was collected at 3 timepoints. A near-infrared spectroscopy device was attached to the forearm to derive the following signals: oxy[haem], deoxy[haem], total[haem], and diff[haem]. These values were normalized and examined across time in 5% segments of time-to-task-failure. Metabolic efficiency was defined as the ratio force:deoxy[haem]. During the IHG, there was a decline in oxy[haem] for the men (b = -0.075), whereas the women demonstrated an increase (b = 0.117). For the men, the diff[haem] tracked the mean oxy[haem] response, but there was no change for the women. The men exhibited greater declines in metabolic efficiency, yet there were no sex differences in PF (46.6 ± 9.7% vs. 45.5 ± 14.2%). For relative MAP, the men (24.5 ± 15.1%) exhibited a greater (p = .03) increase than the women (11.0 ± 17.6%). These results indicated the EPR was more prominent for the men, perhaps due to differences in mechanical stimuli and a lack of ability to maintain metabolic efficiency. However, these physiological differences did not induce a sex difference in performance fatigability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keller et al. (2022) reported an observational. Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Increase in relative mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p=.03). During a fatiguing isometric handgrip task, men exhibited a significantly greater increase in relative mean arterial pressure than women (24.5% vs. 11.0%, p=0.03), with no difference in fatigability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: