Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thirty-six growing-finishing pigs, with an average initial weight of 24.8 kg ± 2.6 SD, were allocated to six groups to determine the effect of fish silage and fish fat in the diet on performance, carcass characteristics and sensory quality. The treatments were either a control diet, or one of three diets containing 50 g kg −1 fish silage and different levels of fish fat (2.5, 5.5 or 9.5 g kg −1 ). The diets were either fed until the time of slaughter (treatments CO, FSA1, FSB1 and FSC1), or until 60 kg liveweight followed by the control diet (the diets with 5.5 [treatment FSB2] and 9.5 g kg −1 fish fat [treatment FSC2]). Pigs were slaughtered at 98.7 kg ± 4.5 SD. No significant differences in growth performance or carcass quality were found among diets. The contents of the fatty acids C20:1 and C22:6 in the subcutaneous fat was increased by the dietary inclusion of fish silage. The total level of omega-3 fatty acids were highest for the 9.5 and the 5.5 g kg −1 fish fat diets when they were fed until slaughter. High blood plasma levels of vitamin E in pigs fed diets containing fish silage and 5.5 g kg −1 fish fat may explain these differences, and thus indicate the importance of vitamin E status when feeding diets containing fish silage and fish fat. The diets containing 2.5 and 9.5 g kg −1 fish fat until slaughter caused off-flavour of bacon after both 1 and 6 mo of frozen storage, and of loin muscle after 6 mo frozen storage. Curiously, the diet with fish silage and 5.5 g kg −1 fish fat could be used in diets for growing-finishing pigs without adverse effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjos et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: