This article examines ongoing contestation surrounding the policies of the F ederal government's ‘Intervention’ in I ndigenous communities in A ustralia's N orthern T erritory. It highlights how the paradigm of ‘evidence‐based policy’ has been used by both the government and its critics, suggesting this commonality of language is worthy of reflection. Cautioning against an over‐reliance on the rationalist framework of ‘evidence‐based policy’, it draws on literature that problematizes this idea and insists on the inherently contested and political nature of the relationship between knowledge, evidence and policy‐making. It concludes by pointing to alternative strategies for improving I ndigenous policy that risk being overlooked by a focus on ‘evidence‐based policy’ as a prescriptive ideal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emma Partridge (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: