Key result
SEIRS modeling estimates an ~12% reinfection rate and persistent transmission for HFMD in Thailand.
Why the study?
There was no nationwide, comprehensive model of hand, foot, and mouth disease epidemic dynamics including reinfections for Thailand to help understand and predict outbreaks.
The basic reproduction number of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Thailand is greater than 1, indicating persistence of the disease, with a high reinfection rate emphasizing the relevance of multiple viral strains.
Supports surveillance amid persistent HFMD transmission in Thailand; leaves open optimal strain-specific controls.
Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a highly contagious disease with several outbreaks in Asian-Pacific countries, including Thailand. With such epidemic characteristics and potential economic impact, HFMD is a significant public health issue in Thailand. Generally, contagious/infectious diseases’ transmission dynamics vary across geolocations due to different socioeconomic situations, demography, and lifestyles. Hence, a nationwide comprehensive model of the disease’s epidemic dynamics can provide information to understand better and predict a potential outbreak of this disease and efficiently and effectively manage its impact. However, there is no nationwide and comprehensive (i.e., the inclusion of reinfections in the model) model of HFDM dynamics for Thailand. This paper has endeavoured to promote nationwide comprehensive modelling of HFMD’s epidemic dynamics and comprehend the reinfection cases. We have formulated the SEIRS epidemiological model with dynamic vitals, including reinfections, to explore this disease’s prevalence. We also introduced periodic seasonality to reproduce the seasonal effect. The pattern of spread of this disease is uneven across the provinces in Thailand, so we used <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>K</a:mi> </a:math> -means clustering algorithm to cluster those provinces into three groups (i.e., highly, moderately, and least affected levels). We also analysed health records collected from district hospitals, which suggest significant reinfection cases. For example, we found that 11% (approximately) of infectious patients return for repeat treatment within the study period. We also performed sensitivity analysis which indicates that the basic reproduction number ( <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:msub> <c:mrow> <c:mi>R</c:mi> </c:mrow> <c:mrow> <c:mn>0</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:msub> </c:math> ) is sensitive to the rate of transmission ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>β</e:mi> </e:math> ) and the rate at which infected people recover ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:mi>γ</g:mi> </g:math> ). By fitting the model with HFMD confirmed data for the provinces in each cluster, the basic reproduction number ( <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <i:msub> <i:mrow> <i:mi>R</i:mi> </i:mrow> <i:mrow> <i:mn>0</i:mn> </i:mrow> </i:msub> </i:math> ) was estimated to be 2.643, 1.91, and 3.246 which are greater than 1. Based on this high <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <k:msub> <k:mrow> <k:mi>R</k:mi> </k:mrow> <k:mrow> <k:mn>0</k:mn> </k:mrow> </k:msub> </k:math> , this study recommends that this disease will persist in the coming years under identical cultural and environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2021) studied Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease. Epidemiological factors (SEIRS modeling) was evaluated on Basic reproduction number (R0) and reinfection rate. SEIRS modeling of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Thailand estimated an 11.92% reinfection rate and basic reproduction numbers ranging from 1.91 to 3.25, indicating persistent transmission.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: