The 3-month reconnection rates for roof line and mitral isthmus line after atrial fibrillation ablation are relatively low (28% and 24%), with poor concordance between acute and late reconnection sites.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Relatively low 3-month RL/MIL reconnection rates support lesion durability in this cohort; leaves open randomized confirmation of clinical impact.
BACKGROUND: Data on the roof line (RL) and mitral isthmus line (MIL) reconnections after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) are scarce. OBJECTIVE: We studied the RL and MIL completeness and localization of reconnection sites in consecutive patients after their first-ever AF-CA. METHODS: We prospectively included 41 consecutive AF patients who underwent predefined lesion sets of two circumferential lines (CLs) for ipsilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) combined with a RL and lateral MIL. Three months after CA, all patients underwent invasive follow-up procedure for line persistency evaluation, irrespective of clinical outcome. RESULTS: At the time of index ablation, PVI-CLs, RL, and MIL was completed in 41 (100%), 39 (95%), and 34 (83%) of patients, respectively. At the 3-month follow-up procedure, reconnections of PVI-CLs, RL, and MIL were found in 61% (25/41), 28% (11/39), and 24% (8/34) of patients, respectively. The 3-month reconnections were located commonly in the anterior and posterior PVI-CL segments, and rarely in the right third of RL and in the posterior part of MIL. The 3-month reconnections were rarely seen at the sites of acute reconnections during index procedure (6%, 20%, and 25% of the PVI-CL segments, RL segments, and MIL segments, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study systematically investigating the reconnection of standardized left atrium linear lesions such as RL and MIL after RF-CA for AF in consecutive patients. The RL and MIL 3-month reconnection rates were relatively low (28% and 24%), with poor anatomical concordance between the sites with acute and 3-month reconnections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mujović et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: