Substituted Li-layered transition-metal oxide (LTMO) electrodes such as Li x Ni y Mn z Co 1– y – z O 2 (NMC) and Li x Ni y Co 1– y – z Al z O 2 (NCA) show reduced first cycle Coulombic efficiency (90–87% under standard cycling conditions) in comparison with the archetypal Li x CoO 2 (LCO; ∼98% efficiency). Focusing on Li x Ni 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 as a model compound, we use operando synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to demonstrate that the apparent first-cycle capacity loss is a kinetic effect linked to limited Li mobility at x > 0.88, with near full capacity recovered during a potentiostatic hold following the galvanostatic charge–discharge cycle. This kinetic capacity loss, unlike many capacity losses in LTMOs, is independent of the cutoff voltage during delithiation and it is a reversible process. The kinetic limitation manifests not only as the kinetic capacity loss during discharge but as a subtle bimodal compositional distribution early in charge and, also, a dramatic increase of the charge–discharge voltage hysteresis at x > 0.88. 7 Li NMR measurements indicate that the kinetic limitation reflects limited Li transport at x > 0.86. Electrochemical measurements on a wider range of LTMOs including Li x (Ni,Fe) y Co 1– y O 2 suggest that 5% substitution is sufficient to induce the kinetic limitation and that the effect is not limited to Ni substitution. We outline how, in addition to a reduction in the number of Li vacancies and shrinkage of the Li-layer size, the intrinsic charge storage mechanism (two-phase vs solid-solution) and localization of charge give rise to additional kinetic barriers in NCA and nonmetallic LTMOs in general.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grenier et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: