During a maximum incremental treadmill test, the heart rate response is best described by a linear model with two segments, allowing for the determination of a heart rate threshold that coincides with the first ventilatory threshold.
The objective of this study was to analyze the heart rate (HR) profile plotted against incremental workloads (IWL) during a treadmill test using three mathematical models [linear, linear with 2 segments (Lin2), and sigmoidal], and to determine the best model for the identification of the HR threshold that could be used as a predictor of ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2). Twenty-two men underwent a treadmill incremental test (retest group: n=12) at an initial speed of 5.5 km.h-1, with increments of 0.5 km.h-1 at 1-min intervals until exhaustion. HR and gas exchange were continuously measured and subsequently converted to 5-s and 20-s averages, respectively. The best model was chosen based on residual sum of squares and mean square error. The HR/IWL ratio was better fitted with the Lin2 model in the test and retest groups (p<0.05). The Lin2 model permitted the identification of the HR threshold (Lin2HRDP) in all subjects of the test (164 ± 16.6 bpm; 83.6% HRMAX) and retest groups (162 ± 20.0 bpm; 83.9% HRMAX). Lin2HRDP (9.2 ± 1.3 km.h-1; 67.9% speedMAX) was lower than VT2 (10.6 ± 1.5 km.h-1, 77.3% speedMAX; p<0.05), but did not differ from VT1 (8.4 ± 1.2 km.h-1, 61.6% speedMAX; p>0.05). During a treadmill incremental test, the HR/IWL ratio seems to be better fitted with a Lin2 model, which permits to determine the HR threshold that coincides with VT1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nascimento et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: