Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Management of glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-hyperglycaemia, or GCK-MODY) GC in pregnancy relies on knowledge of foetal genotype, which is traditionally estimated by foetal ultrasound measurements with poor diagnostic accuracy. Non-invasive pre-natal testing for GCK-MODY genotype (NIPT-GCK) has recently been developed (Exeter, United Kingdom) and is highly accurate but not currently available in Australia. AIM: We aimed to investigate the clinical and health economic impact of NIPT-GCK MODY testing in Australia. METHODS: A case series of two pregnancies affected by GCK-MODY in pregnancy was conducted. Case 1 had NIPT undertaken at Exeter University, United Kingdom, while case 2 was managed per standard care with ultrasound estimation of foetal genotype. Clinical outcomes and health system costs were obtained from medical and health system records. RESULTS: Case 1 (42-year-old female, G8P1) had GCK-NIPT at 19 weeks, with the baby confirmed to have GCK-MODY. Management was tailored to this result, with a reduced physical and psychological burden of the disease. Case 2 (33-year-old female, gravida 2 para 1) declined NIPT because of cost and had genotype estimated from serial ultrasound methods with post-partum genetic testing required. After adjustment for additional maternal co-morbidities and standardisation of care setting, the GCK-MODY NIPT was cost-effective (-$266) and patient concern and care burden were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT has the potential to improve diagnostic uncertainty associated with the management of GCK-MODY in pregnancy, reduce the economic and personal burden of intensive foetal monitoring and improve perinatal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: