Why the study?
It remained unclear whether cardiac morphogenesis disruption and endothelial-to-hematopoietic transformation were specifically driven by Dsg2 deficiency or reflected impaired desmosome adhesion broadly.
Deficiency in the arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy-associated gene Pkp2 impairs embryonic heart development by disrupting epicardial desmosomes and triggering abnormal mesenchymal and hematopoietic transformation.
Desmosomal junctions provide structural stability supporting concerted cardiomyocyte contractility. Previously, we demonstrated that a deficiency in the desmosomal transmembrane cadherin desmoglein 2 (Dsg2) reduces desmosome formation and disrupts cardiac morphogenesis, leading to excessive endothelial-to-hematopoietic cell transformation and embryonic lethality. It remained unclear whether this phenotype was specifically driven by Dsg2-deficiency or was a broader consequence of impaired desmosome adhesion. To address this question, we generated Pkp2mt/mt mouse embryos lacking the desmosomal plaque protein Pkp2, which resulted in loss of desmosome formation. Despite the absence of cardiac wall rupture, Pkp2mt/mt and some Pkp2wt/mt presented accumulations of Ter-119+ blood cells and RUNX1+/CD44+ hematopoietic stem cells in the pericardial space. Remarkably, in Pkp2mt/mt hearts, the epicardium was detached from the myocardium, contained rounded cells expressing the hematopoietic stem cell marker RUNX1, and showed altered intermediate filament expression. These findings suggest a potential trans-differentiation of the epicardial cells into hematopoietic cells. In conclusion, deficiencies in both Dsg2 and Pkp2 promote hematopoiesis in the developing murine heart but target different cell types, i.e., endothelial cells, which lack desmosomes, or desmosome-containing epicardial cells. Our results provide evidence for the involvement of Pkp2 in epicardial morphogenesis and remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolaji et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: