The general species (2,2′‐bpy)MX 2 (M = Pd, Pt; X = Br, I) in a crystallization process results in an isomorphous convergence in P 2 1 /c. Yet, with polyfluorinated side chains, the general [5,5′‐(HCF 2 CF 2 CH 2 OCH 2 ) 2 ‐2,2′‐bpy]MX 2 species proceeds to crystallize the isomorphous structures of 5 (M = Pt; X = I) and 6 (M = Pd; X = I) in P 2 1 /c only; structure 7 (M = Pt; X = Br) crystallizes in P 2 1 /c but is not isomorphous with 5 and 6 , and structure 8 (M = Pd; X = Br) forms differently in P– 1. The causes making the system nonlinear are (1) the intramolecular CF 2 ─H … X(─M) hydrogen bonds found in 5–7 but not in 8, and (2) in response to the transition from I to Br, bifurcated [C─H … ] 2 F ─C hydrogen bonds that are formed in 5 and 6 and bifurcated C─ H [ … F─C] 2 hydrogen bonds in 7 . Additionally, the intramolecular CF 2 ─H … X(─M) hydrogen bonding from compounds 5–7 could be affirmed by the IR studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: