In Brief Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate standardized automated segmentation procedures of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in imaging of age-related macular degeneration. Methods: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration were included. Three groups were assigned, according to the predominant localization of extravasated fluid in the intra-, subretinal, and subretinal pigment epithelium (RPE) compartment. Automated segmentation procedures were evaluated in B scans of 512 × 128 × 1024 and 200 × 200 × 1024 scan patterns using SD-OCT (Cirrus). Alignment errors at the internal limiting membrane, actual RPE, and extrapolation of the physiologic RPE (RPE fit) were graded using a standardized classification system. Results: The rate of severe alignment failures was 56% and 41% for the 512 × 128 and the 200 × 200 raster pattern, respectively. Internal limiting membrane and actual RPE boundaries were most correctly delineated in the 200 × 200 raster pattern. Retinal pigment epithelium fit alignment was generally poor in 50% of scans. Retinal thickness values defined by internal limiting membrane and actual RPE segmentation were 90% accurate and not compromised by RPE fit misalignment. Subretinal fluid was demarcated most reliably. Alignment errors may occur together with a large spectrum of morphologic alterations. Conclusion: Automated algorithms of SD-OCT demonstrate a substantial rate of alignment failures in the assessment of exudative age-related macular degeneration pathologies, which are usually associated with misinterpretation of boundaries at the (sub) RPE level. Segmentation procedures of high-definition spectral domain Cirrus OCT (Zeiss Meditec) were evaluated in patients with neovascular fluid. Subretinal fluid and 200 × 200 raster scans were most reliably demarcated. Severe alignment age-related macular degeneration in respect to differential accumulation of exudative failures can lead to misinterpretation of subretinal pigment epithelium level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malamos et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: