Why the study?
Factors parents consider in treatment decision making for children diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy on newborn screening needed to be identified.
What factors do parents consider when choosing treatments for infants with spinal muscular atrophy diagnosed through newborn screening?
What factors do parents consider when choosing treatments for infants with spinal muscular atrophy diagnosed through newborn screening?
Treatment frequency and administration method are the primary drivers for parents when selecting therapies for infants with SMA diagnosed via newborn screening.
Survey of 18 parents identifies SMA treatment decision factors; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for larger prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors parents considered in treatment decision making for children diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy on newborn screening. METHODS: Participants were recruited through the University of Rochester or through flyers and Cure SMA social media outreach and asked to complete a telephone or online survey. Data were analyzed through mixed methods using descriptive statistics and theme identification in narrative responses. RESULTS: Eighteen parents with children diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy on newborn screening participated. Thirteen of 18 chose onasemnogene abeparvovec, 2 of 18 chose risdiplam, 1 of 18 chose nusinersen, and 2 of 18 did not receive treatment. The most commonly reported factors impacting treatment choice included treatment frequency and administration method. Seventeen (94.4%) parents felt that inclusion of spinal muscular atrophy on newborn screening was positive because it could allow for better outcomes with earlier treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment frequency and administration method were the most important factors for parents in determining spinal muscular atrophy treatment. Parents felt positively about newborn screening due to opportunity for earlier treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: