Why the study?
Does depressed baroreflex sensitivity predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without structural heart disease?
Does depressed baroreflex sensitivity predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without structural heart disease?
Depressed baroreflex sensitivity is an independent predictor of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes without structural heart disease.
May aid MACE risk stratification in T2DM without SHD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy is a major complication in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the relationship between cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and the incidence of cardiovascular events has been poorly investigated in type 2 DM. The present study aimed to assess the long-term cardiovascular predictive value of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in Japanese patients with type 2 DM without structural heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: BRS was evaluated using the phenylephrine method in 210 patients with type 2 DM who did not have structural heart disease or other severe complications. BRS was considered depressed if <6 ms/mmHg. Accurate follow-up information for 3-10 years (mean 4.7 years) was obtained in 184 patients (90 females, 94 males; mean age 58+/-12 years). The initial onset of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was investigated. During follow-up, 19 patients presented with a MACE (4 cardiovascular deaths, 3 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, 4 coronary revascularizations, 5 strokes, 2 congestive heart failures). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that depressed BRS was independently associated with the incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.82, P=0.0236). CONCLUSIONS: Depressed BRS at baseline has long-term cardiovascular predictive value in Japanese patients with type 2 DM without structural heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okada et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: