In order to understand the role of Co catalysts with different phases on Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, single-phase face-centered-cubic (fcc) and hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) Co were synthesized via a two-step approach, involving the formation of single-phase CoO materials followed by reduction in H 2 . The physicochemical properties of Co catalysts were thoroughly characterized by XRD, SEM, TEM, TPR, and H 2 chemisorption. It was found that hcp-Co exhibits higher activity on hydrocarbon formation than fcc-Co in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. For both catalysts, CO dissociation was suggested as the rate-determining step, on which hcp-Co presents ca. 40 kJ mol –1 lower activation energy than fcc-Co, in agreement with a reported computational study. As a result, hcp-Co is concluded to be the preferable phase for rational catalyst design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyu et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: