Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As Editor-in-Chief of the Transactions, I have noticed over the past year or so that the occasional incorrect use of the term return loss has now grown into a flood of misuse. Perhaps over 30% of all antenna papers submitted to the Transactions in the past twelve months have used return loss incorrectly. The reason for this is uncertain. To remind everyone of the correct terminology, I review the definition of return loss, briefly outline the history of the term, and give some examples of current misuse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trevor S. Bird (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: