Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No evidence of efferent inhibitory activity on eel lateral line sensory cells has been found in a number of different types of experiments. Proximal transection of the lateral line nerve induces no changes in the ongoing activity from the sensory cells, even in the uncurarized, un‐anesthetized animal. Stimulation of peripheral nerve filaments induces no inhibition of afferent spontaneous and/or evoked activity, either ipsilaterally or contralaterally. No spontaneous or evoked efferent activtiy could be recorded from proximal nerve filaments. Antidromic invasion of sensory terminals resets the ongoing spontaneous activity. In the intervening interval the mechanical and electrical thresholds of these sensory units are similarly elevated. Antidromic invasion is suggested to be the phenomenon reported as peripheral inhibition by Hashimoto et al. (1970).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egil Alnæs (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: