Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reactions of wild-type trimethylamine dehydrogenase (TMADH) and of a His-172-->Gln (H172Q) mutant were studied by rapid-mixing stopped-flow spectroscopy over the pH range 6.0-10.5, to address the potential role of His-172 in abstracting a proton from the substrate in a 'carbanion' mechanism for C-H bond cleavage. The pH-dependence of the limiting rate for flavin reduction (klim) was studied as a function of pH for the wild-type enzyme with perdeuterated trimethylamine as substrate. The use of perdeuterated trimethylamine facilitated the unequivocal identification of two kinetically influential ionizations in the enzyme-substrate complex, with macroscopic pKa values of 6.5+/-0.2 and 8.4+/-0.1. A plot of klim/Kd revealed a bell-shaped curve and two kinetically influential ionizations with macroscopic pKa values of 9.4+/-0.1 and 10.5+/-0.1. Mutagenesis of His-172, a potential active-site base and a component of a novel Tyr-His-Asp triad in the active site of TMADH, revealed that the pKa of 8.4+/-0.1 for the wild-type enzyme-substrate complex represents ionization of the imidazolium side-chain of His-172. H172Q TMADH retains catalytic competence throughout the pH range investigated. At pH 10.5, and in contrast with the wild-type enzyme, flavin reduction in H172Q TMADH is biphasic. The fast phase is dependent on the trimethylamine concentration and exhibits a kinetic isotope effect of about 3; C-H bond cleavage is thus partially rate-limiting. In contrast, the slow phase does not show hyperbolic dependence on substrate concentration, and the observed rate shows no dependence on isotope, revealing that C-H bond cleavage is not rate-limiting. The analysis of H172Q TMADH, together with data recently acquired for the Y169F mutant of TMADH, reveals that C-H bond breakage is not initiated via abstraction of a proton from the substrate by an active-site base. The transfer of reducing equivalents to flavin via a carbanion mechanism is therefore unlikely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basran et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: