Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer (DU) with ranitidine 150 mg/day was compared with placebo in a two year prospective multicentre randomised study. Three hundred and ninety nine patients were included (mean age: 44.7 years, M/F ratio = 2.47/1; 37.6% of smokers) in placebo (n = 202) and ranitidine (n = 197) groups. Efficacy was assessed by the length of time to the first ulcer pain attack (with or without endoscopic confirmation) or DU complication. One hundred and fourteen patients of 399 (28.6%) had incomplete follow up. Actuarial survival curves of patients without ulcer pain (26 and 53% at two years in placebo and ranitidine groups, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.0001). Endoscopies were performed depending on physicians' decision (mainly where there was severe pain or complication). Patients without relapses from endoscopy were more frequent in the ranitidine group (83%) than in the placebo group (47%, p < 0.0001). A greater incidence of complications, mainly bleeding, was also seen in the placebo group (13 complications v two in the ranitidine group, p < 0.002). No factor predicting DU relapse was identified. No important side effect was encountered. Ranitidine 150 mg/day is effective and well tolerated in preventing ulcer pain attacks and DU complications for up to two years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruszniewski et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: