Why the study?
Do physical education teachers differ from non-PE teachers in their implicit anti-fat bias towards overweight children?
Do physical education teachers differ from non-PE teachers in their implicit anti-fat bias towards overweight children?
Physical education teachers, particularly males, exhibit stronger implicit anti-fat biases regarding motivation and laziness towards overweight students compared to general teachers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar implicit attitudes in PE and non-PE teachers; leaves open effects on student interactions or outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to examine implicit attitudes of physical education (PE) and non-PE teachers towards overweight children stratified by gender, age, and body mass index. Two hundred school teachers (50% PE and 50% non-PE), aged 23-60 (mean=33.5 years) from Hong Kong, China, completed the validated implicit association test to measure attitudes towards overweight children. On the good-bad scale, there were no significant differences between scores for type of teacher. Younger teachers showed more weight discrimination against overweight students compared to their older counterparts. The interaction between type of teacher and gender was significant for the motivated-lazy score. Compared to PE teachers, non-PE teachers demonstrated less discrimination toward the overweight students on motivated-lazy score. Teachers demonstrated implicit weight discrimination toward overweight students. PE teachers are more prone to negative stereotypes related to motivation and laziness. The order of greatest overweight discrimination against overweight students was (1) male PE teachers, (2) female PE teachers, (3) non-PE female teachers and (4) non-PE male teachers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: