Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the past decade, there has been an upsurge of research on bilingualism.A theme in this work is that the bilingual's two languages are always active, at times converging with one another to produce benefits to comprehension and production, but at other times conflicting, with the requirement to negotiate cross-language competition.A goal in the recent work has been to characterize the cognitive processes that enable bilinguals to negotiate the cross-talk between their two languages.The ease with which highly proficient bilinguals are able to speak each of their languages without frequent errors or intrusions and, at the same time, switch between the two languages in contexts in which code switching is appropriate or encouraged, suggests the presence of a high level of cognitive control.At the same time, behavioral and neurocognitive studies have shown that bilinguals differ from monolinguals in their performance on tasks that are purely cognitive, often showing advantages relative to monolinguals, and clear differences in neural function and structure.A key question is how we might begin to relate the findings on language control to the documented cognitive consequences of bilingualism.The papers in this special issue on Bilingualism and Cognitive Control represent the best of the new research on each of these issues to understand how control in language processing is achieved and how domain-general cognitive processes are themselves affected by language experience.In what follows, we review and summarize the main goals of the papers that comprise this effort.We note that the questions about cognitive control are increasingly exploiting sophisticated methods (e.g., see the work using delta plot analysis, Roelofs et al., 2011) and extending analyses of executive function to different populations of language users (e.g., Tao et al., 2011).We set out in this special topic issue to ask a number of questions concerning cognitive control in bilingualism.The contributing authors addressed these questions in very different and interesting ways.A still controversial issue is: How is cognitive control manifest during bilingual language processing?Calabria et al. (2012) asked whether bilingual language control is the same as other types of cognitive control.The pattern of symmetrical switch costs that is often obtained for proficient bilinguals did not replicate across domain in a non-linguistic switch task in the same group.Therefore, the authors argue that bilingual language control is not completely subsidiary to domain general control.Their conclusions contrast to those of Roelofs et al. (2011) who used delta-plot analyses to show that telltale characteristics of the reaction time distribution in bilingual naming performance shows clear similarities with performance in other domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christoffels et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: