There is nothing in this World constant but Inconstancy. [Swift 1711 Swift, J. 1711. “A Critical Essay on the Faculties of the Mind”. In Miscellanies in Prose and Verse, 247–259. London: Printed for John Morphew. [Google Scholar]: 258] In this paper I argue that two standard characterizations of colour constancy are inadequate to the phenomenon. This inadequacy matters, since, I contend, philosophical appeals to colour constancy as a way of motivating illumination-independent conceptions of colour turn crucially on the shortcomings of these characterizations. After critically reviewing the standard characterizations, I provide a novel counterfactualist understanding of colour constancy, argue that it avoids difficulties of its traditional rivals, and defend it from objections. Finally, I show why, on this improved understanding, colour constancy does not have the philosophical consequences that have been claimed for it in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Cohen (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: