Why the study?
Existing real-world studies were reviewed to understand how their safety data on direct oral anticoagulants complement or contradict hallmark trial findings.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improve safety outcomes compared to warfarin in patients requiring stroke prevention?
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improve safety outcomes compared to warfarin in patients requiring stroke prevention?
Real-world evidence confirms that DOACs are at least as effective and safe as warfarin, consistent with findings from hallmark randomized controlled trials.
Real-world data support DOAC safety in routine practice; extends RCT evidence but leaves open questions on rare long-term risks.
INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be regarded as some of the most successful innovations in recent times. These drugs which were specifically developed to overcome the challenges posed by warfarin did just that and in the process, have changed the outlook towards stroke prevention with anticoagulation. The decade of experience with these drugs that has resulted in the availability of large scale data on their safety profile has aided this. Areas covered: This review examines existing real-world studies (RWS) and their interpretation to better appreciate how they either complement or contradict findings from the hallmark trials. Specific focus has been made on the safety of DOACs, on their risks of major bleeding, intra-cranial haemorrhage (ICH), gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin and each other. DOAC use in the elderly and other sub-groups are briefly discussed. Expert opinion: Results for safety outcomes according to 'real world evidence' (RWE) are in-keeping with randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and currently, all 4 DOACs have been deemed at least as effective as warfarin, while demonstrating superiority in some aspects. While real world studies act as a complementary source of knowledge, traditional RCTs remain the gold standard for determining cause-effect relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fawzy et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: