Why the study?
The study aimed to develop an accurate model for classifying sleep stages using heart rate variability features extracted from ECG to assess sleep quality.
Does the integration of ELM and PSO improve sleep stage classification accuracy using HRV features from ECG compared to SVM or ELM alone?
Does the integration of ELM and PSO improve sleep stage classification accuracy using HRV features from ECG compared to SVM or ELM alone?
The integration of Extreme Learning Machine and Particle Swarm Optimization improves the accuracy of sleep stage classification using ECG-derived heart rate variability compared to standard machine learning models.
Recent developments of portable sensor devices, cloud computing, and machine learning algorithms have led to the emergence of big data analytics in healthcare. The condition of the human body, e.g. the ECG signal, can be monitored regularly by means of a portable sensor device. The use of the machine learning algorithm would then provide an overview of a patient’s current health on a regular basis compared to a medical doctor’s diagnosis that can only be made during a hospital visit. This work aimed to develop an accurate model for classifying sleep stages by features of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) extracted from Electrocardiogram (ECG). The sleep stages classification can be utilized to predict the sleep stages proportion. Where sleep stages proportion information can provide an insight of human sleep quality. The integration of Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was utilized for selecting features and determining the number of hidden nodes. The results were compared to Support Vector Machine (SVM) and ELM methods which are lower than the integration of ELM with PSO. The results of accuracy tests for the combined ELM and PSO were 62.66%, 71.52%, 76.77%, and 82.1% respectively for 6, 4, 3, and 2 classes. To sum up, the classification accuracy can be improved by deploying PSO algorithm for feature selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Surantha et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: