This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Early studies assessing peripartum mood disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic have conflicting results.Objective: The primary aim was to examine if postpartum depression (PPD) was more common or more severe during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to earlier periods, and to assess what individual factors may worsen the impact of the pandemic.Methods: Electronic health records at an academic pediatric practice in Michigan identified 242 biological mother-child dyads with delivery between 1/1/2017 and 12/31/2021. PPD was evaluated using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during well-child visits. Participants were divided into three groups for analysis: Pre-Pandemic (n = 100), Early Pandemic (n = 93), and Later Pandemic (n = 49). Logistic regression analysis was used to predict PPD development, controlling for background factors.Results: After controlling for confounders, the three groups did not differ significantly. Preexisting mental health conditions was a significant (p<.001) moderator; PPD rates peaked early in the pandemic (60%), compared to late pandemic (42%) and pre-pandemic (36%). Women without a mental health diagnosis pre-pregnancy experienced the lowest levels of PPD during the pandemic.Conclusions: Rates of PPD were not significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic for most women. However, biological mothers with preexisting mental health conditions had significantly higher rates of PPD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Droke et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: