Key result
Metabolic syndrome prediction models show high discrimination but suffer from universal high risk of bias.
Systematic Review (n=11)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: A prognostic prediction model for metabolic syndrome can calculate the probability of risk of experiencing metabolic syndrome within a specific period for individualized treatment decisions. We aimed to provide a systematic review and critical appraisal on prognostic models for metabolic syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were identified through searching in English databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) and Chinese databases (Sinomed, WANFANG, CNKI, and CQVIP). A checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modeling studies (CHARMS) and the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) were used for the data extraction process and critical appraisal. RESULTS: From the 29,668 retrieved articles, eleven studies meeting the selection criteria were included in this review. Forty-eight predictors were identified from prognostic prediction models. The c-statistic ranged from 0.67 to 0.95. Critical appraisal has shown that all modeling studies were subject to a high risk of bias in methodological quality mainly driven by outcome and statistical analysis, and six modeling studies were subject to a high risk of bias in applicability. CONCLUSION: Future model development and validation studies should adhere to the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement to improve methodological quality and applicability, thus increasing the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study. It is not appropriate to adopt any of the identified models in this study for clinical practice since all models are prone to optimism and overfitting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Metabolic syndrome (n=11). Prognostic prediction models was evaluated on Model performance (c-statistic) and risk of bias (c-statistic 0.67 to 0.95). Prognostic prediction models for metabolic syndrome showed c-statistics of 0.67 to 0.95, but all models had a high risk of methodological bias and are prone to optimism and overfitting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: