Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examine situations in which a party must make a sunk investment prior to contracting with a second party to purchase an essential complementary input. We study how the resulting hold‐up problem is affected by the seller's information about the investing party's likely returns from its investment. Our principal focus is on the effects of the investment's being observable by the noninvesting party. We establish conditions under which the seller's ability to observe the buyer's investment harms the seller, benefits the buyer, and reduces equilibrium investment and total surplus. We also note conditions under which investment and welfare rise when investment is observable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hermalin et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: