This article concludes with some reflections on the state of the discipline of evaluation, reflections which synthesize a number of considerations. In this respect it is like many evaluations which close with an overview-a synthesis of preceding sub-conclusions-but it is unlike them in that its content consists of a discussion of the methodology of the last synthesis step in an evaluation-of whether and how to make it. In many evaluations, the lack of any explicit
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Scriven (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: