Why the study?
Pre-TAVR physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve-computed tomography had not been validated in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR due to theoretical difficulties with nitroglycerin use.
Does pre-TAVR FFRCT without nitroglycerin accurately predict post-TAVR invasive FFR in adult patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR?
Does pre-TAVR FFRCT without nitroglycerin accurately predict post-TAVR invasive FFR in adult patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR?
Pre-TAVR FFRCT without nitroglycerin provides good diagnostic accuracy for predicting the physiological significance of coronary stenoses in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.
Pre-TAVR iFR may aid CAD assessment in severe AS; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending prospective validation.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: