Why the study?
It remains unclear whether surgical or nonsurgical containment treatment is better for Legg-Calve-Perthes disease patients with onset between 6.0 and 8.0 years of age.
Does Salter osteotomy improve radiological and clinical outcomes compared to a non-weight-bearing brace in children aged 6.0-8.0 years with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
Does Salter osteotomy improve radiological and clinical outcomes compared to a non-weight-bearing brace in children aged 6.0-8.0 years with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
In children aged 6.0-8.0 years with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, Salter osteotomy provides better femoral head position and acetabular shape and coverage than a non-weight-bearing brace, though clinical outcomes like pain and motion are similar.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimal containment for LCPD at ages 6-8 remains uncertain; leaves open whether Salter osteotomy or bracing is superior.
Since bone healing potential decreases with age, patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease should receive treatment appropriate to their age group. Nonsurgical treatment is commonly applied to patients under 6.0 years of age at the onset and surgical treatment is recommended for those over 8.0 years of age, but it remains unclear which is better for those between 6.0 and 8.0 years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes of Salter osteotomy and a non-weight-bearing brace in this age group. Inclusion criteria were unilateral Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease patients who were 6.0-8.0 years of age at the onset, who had more than 50% femoral head involvement without hinge abduction, and who underwent either Salter osteotomy (n = 35) or a non-weight-bearing hip flexion-abduction brace (n = 18). Radiological and clinical outcomes at skeletal maturity were compared between the two groups. The mean follow-up durations were 9.4 years in the Salter osteotomy group and 10.0 years in the brace group. There was no significant difference in the modified Waldenström classification at the beginning of treatment and the Catterall and modified lateral pillar classifications evaluated at the fragmentation stage between the groups. At skeletal maturity, the Stulberg classification, the sphericity deviation score, femoral head overgrowth, and the articulo-trochanteric distance were similar between the groups, but the Salter osteotomy group showed significantly smaller lateralization of the femoral head and better acetabular shape and coverage than the brace group: femoral head lateralization (P < 0.001), acetabular depth-to-width ratio (P = 0.002), Sharp angle (P < 0.001), lateral acetabular shape (P = 0.027), acetabular head index (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hip pain and motion between the groups. In this age group, Salter osteotomy provides better femoral head position and acetabular shape and coverage than a non-weight-bearing brace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneko et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: