Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study finds Campylobacter contamination in nearly half of raw milk samples, highlighting significant foodborne infection risks from unpasteurized dairy.
The consumption of raw milk has been demonstrated to carry a potential risk of transmission of Campylobacter spp., with Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) and Campylobacter coli (C. coli) being the major causes for foodborne gastroenteritis cases. The present study assessed the prevalence and species distribution of Campylobacter spp. in 633 raw milk samples collected over a one-year climatic cycle from small, medium, and large producers in Pichincha and Manabí, Ecuador. Samples were augmented and analyzed by qPCR for Campylobacter spp., while species identification was performed by duplex PCR and confirmed by 16S rDNA sequencing. The average prevalence of Campylobacter spp. was 49.9% (316/633), with a higher detection rate in Manabí (57.6%, 182/316) compared to Pichincha (42.4%, 134/316). C. coli was the most prevalent species, accounting for 46.2% (146/316) of the cases, followed by C. jejuni at 23.1% (73/316), co-contaminations at 13.3% (42/316), and non-identified Campylobacter at 44.0% (139/316). Phylogenetic analysis was employed to confirm species identity, thereby confirming the presence of Campylobacter fetus and Campylobacter lari. The increased diversity and frequency of isolates in Manabí, particularly during periods of elevated temperature, imply that coastal environmental conditions and production practices promote the persistence of bacteria. The findings of this study indicate a high prevalence of Campylobacter in Ecuadorian raw milk, posing a significant health risk to the population and underscoring the need for enhanced hygiene practices and continuous monitoring to mitigate public health risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Padilla-Cerda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: