Introduction The rapid spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC)-producing bacteria comprises one of the greatest challenges to global health. Historically, clinicians were limited to therapies with suboptimal efficacy and intolerable toxicity until the FDA approved ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam, adding two essential pharmacotherapies to our antibiotic armamentarium. These agents display superior efficacy and safety compared to historical treatment options; however, resistance has already been reported. Several antimicrobials currently in the drug pipeline exhibit early promise and may fill needed gaps in therapy. Areas covered This article encompasses both the past and present treatment options for the management of KPC-producing bacterial infections via an extensive review and critical appraisal of the current literature. Expert opinion Traditional treatment options can no longer be recommended as first-line options for the management of KPC-producing bloodstream infections. Ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam plus or minus an aminoglycoside or polymyxin should be utilized as backbone therapies given their superior efficacy and safety profiles when compared to traditional treatment options. For susceptible KPC-producing urinary tract infections, it is reasonable to consider treatment with an aminoglycoside or with fosfomycin as a monotherapy. All of these decisions should be based on patient-specific characteristics, severity of infection and source control, susceptibility patterns, and input from infectious diseases experts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plazak et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: