The role of technique and technology in psychological counseling is briefly discussed. A preoccupation with both has characterized approaches to knowledge and power for several centuries. It is argued that the distinction between “knowing that” and “knowing how” is an important one in professional training. Techniques are necessary codifications of more basic, abstract development. The counseling apprentice and supervisor should therefore relegate technique and technical skills to an important, but hardly central, role in psychological services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael J. Mahoney (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: