Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis of the ligands N, N -bis[(2-pyridyl)methyl]-1-(2-pyridyl)ethanamine ( 1, α-MeTPA), N, N -bis[(6-phenyl-2-pyridyl)methyl]-1-(2-pyridyl)ethanamine ( 2, α-MePh 2 TPA), N, N -bis[(2-quinolyl)methyl]-1-(2-pyridyl)ethanamine, ( 3, α-MeBQPA), and N, N -bis[(2-pyridyl)]methyl(phenyl)(2-pyridyl)methanamine ( 4, α-PhTPA) is described. The ligands form chiral, pseudo C 3 -symmetric complexes with Zn II and Cu II salts that possess an available electrophilic coordination site. X-ray crystallographic structures of the complexes [Zn(α-MeTPA)Cl](ClO 4 ), [Zn(α-MeBQPA)Cl](ClO 4 ), and [Zn(α-PhTPA)Cl](ClO 4 ) show that the spatial arrangement of the three pyridyl groups resembles a propeller whose directional sense is controlled by a substituent on one methylene arm. Chiroptical measurements provide supporting information that the complexes maintain similar structures in solution. Monte Carlo/stochastic dynamics (MC/SD) simulations of the [Zn(L)Cl] + complexes indicate that only two conformers are populated at normal temperatures, suggest the presence of a synchronicity in the movement of the heteroaromatic rings during conformer interconversions, and provide an estimate of the energy difference between the conformers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canary et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: