Why the study?
Does Shexiang Baoxin Pill or a cardiovascular polypill improve metabolomic biomarkers in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Does Shexiang Baoxin Pill or a cardiovascular polypill improve metabolomic biomarkers in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
In a rat model of myocardial infarction, the traditional Chinese medicine Shexiang Baoxin Pill demonstrated superior regulation of metabolic and inflammatory pathways compared to a standard cardiovascular polypill.
Rat MI findings are hypothesis-generating; should not inform clinical use of SBP or polypill.
A metabolomic approach based on liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight detector (LC-Q-TOF/MS) was developed to investigate the therapeutic mechanism of a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula Shexiang Baoxin Pill (SBP) and a multi-component medicine polypill (consisting of simvastatin (Sim), atenolol (Ate), ramipril (Ram), hydrochlorthiazide (Hyd) and aspirin (Asp), named as SARHA). Twenty-seven biomarkers were identified in the serum of MI rats. Thirteen related pathways and 4 main pathological processes including oxidative injury, energy metabolism dysfunction, amino acid metabolism dysfunction and inflammation are involved in MI development. Our study revealed that SBP showed better therapeutic effectiveness than the polypill on MI through regulation of the energy metabolism dysfunction, oxidative injury and inflammation. The combination agent polypill had only certain therapeutic effects on inhibiting oxidative injury and inflammation induced by MI. The reverse effect of the polypill on biomarkers related to MI was much better than mono-therapy groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: