Authors
Ducted propellers and turbines operating in a square closed wind tunnel test section are analyzed. A multiple image method is used to account for tunnel wall interference effects and a detailed method of singularities model is used for the ducted rotor. The size of the rotor wake is computed, taking into account the tunnel walls. Several ducted rotor model/wind tunnel dimension ratios are examined, ranging between 0.02 and 0.50. In addition, ducted rotor disk loading coefficients, CT , between - 30 and 0.89 are considered (the negative values correspond to the rotor acting as a propeller; the positive values indicate that the rotor is a turbine). Values of ideal propeller thrust are reduced by over 30% at the highest value of propeller disk loading (CT = — 30). The tunnel wall effect for a ducted turbine is less than for a ducted propeller and is opposite in direction. For the nearoptimum condition CT. =0.89, the ideal turbine power is increased by about 8% for the largest model/tunnel ratio considered. Nomenclature CP. = ideal thrust power coefficient for DAP (diffuseraugmented propeller) or ideal power coefficient for DAWT (diffuser-augmented wind turbine) CT() = disk loading coefficient based on freestream dynamic head D = dimension of wind tunnel test section E = complete elliptic integral, Eq. (5) K = complete elliptic integral, Eq. (4) kn = function of ring vortex coordinates and field point coordinates, Eq. (3) TV = the number of images along the side of a square image array q = velocity in r direction r = radial coordinate rp = ideal power augmentation ratio R = diffuser radius at a particular value of z S = the number of vortex rings used to represent the diffuser surface T = total number of vortices used to represent both the diffuser and the wake u = velocity in x direction U0 = freestream velocity, dimensional v = velocity in y direction w = velocity in z direction (axial direction) x = lateral coordinate in plane perpendicular to mean flow y = vertical coordinate in plane perpendicular to mean
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loeffler et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: