Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 27, 2023EyeOpen Access

Comparison of standard versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: 5-year outcomes from the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HKHimal KandelSydney HospitalMAMarco AbbondanzaThe University of SydneyAGAanchal GuptaRoyal Adelaide Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kandel et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6fc69b84cc45bb7bdfa9d3https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02641-6
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Standard Versus Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking for Keratoconus: 1-Year Outcomes From the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study2021 · 24 citations
  2. 2Real-World Evidence — What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?2016 · 2,141 citations
  3. 3Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Standard Versus Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking for Keratoconus: 1-Year Outcomes From the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study2021 · 24 citations
  4. 4Patient-Reported Outcomes in Keratoconus: A Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study2022 · 26 citations
  5. 5Comparison of Standard Versus Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis2018 · 88 citations