To evaluate whether repeated application of riboflavin during corneal cross-linking (CXL) has an impact on the corneal biomechanical strength in ex-vivo porcine corneas. Laboratory investigation. Sixty-six porcine corneas with intact epithelium were divided into three groups and analyzed. All corneas were pre-soaked with an iso-osmolar solution of 0.1% riboflavin in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (“riboflavin solution”). Then, the corneas in Groups 1 and 2 were irradiated with a standard epi-off CXL (S-CXL) UV-A irradiation protocol (3 mW/cm2 for 30 min); while the corneas in Group 3 were not irradiated and served as control. During irradiation, Group 1 (CXL-PBS-Ribo) received repeated riboflavin solution application while corneas in Group 2 (CXL-PBS) received only repeated iso-osmolar PBS solution. Immediately after the procedure, 5-mm wide corneal strips were prepared, and elastic modulus was calculated to characterize biomechanical properties. Significant differences in stress-strain extensiometry were found between two cross-linked groups with control group (P = 0.005 and 0.002, respectively). No significant difference was observed in the normalized stiffening effect between Groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.715). The repeated application of riboflavin solution during UV-A irradiation does not affect the corneal biomechanical properties achieved with standard epi-off CXL. Riboflavin application during CXL may be omitted without altering the biomechanical stiffening induced by the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdshahzadeh et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: