Why the study?
Does female gender compared to male gender increase the burden of risk factors, complications, and underutilization of therapy in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction?
Does female gender compared to male gender increase the burden of risk factors, complications, and underutilization of therapy in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction?
Women hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction in Albania present with a higher burden of metabolic risk factors, experience more complications, and undergo fewer revascularization procedures compared to men.
Women with AMI may carry higher metabolic risks and receive less therapy; this hypothesis-generating observation leaves open targeted strategies.
AIM: To determine the clinical profile, burden of risk factors, and quality of care among patients hospitalized for an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with special focus on gender differences. METHODS: The study included 256 AMI patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit of "Mother Teresa" hospital in Tirana during 2013-2014. We obtained information on patients' demographic data, AMI characteristics, complications (heart failure [HF] and ventricular fibrillation [VF]), risk factors and medication use prior and during the AMI hospitalization. Age-adjusted Poisson regression analyses were applied to explore gender differences (women vs men) with regard to clinical profile and quality of care and results are expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRR). RESULTS: 55.4% of patients had ≥3 risk factors, 44.5% developed HF, and 5.7% developed VF. Only 40.4% of patients received all 4 medication classes (beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, and aspirin) and 46.4% had revascularization. Significantly more women than men were obese, (P=0.042) had diabetes, (P=0.001) developed HF (P<0.001) or experienced a VF episode (P<0.001). After adjusting for age, differences with regard to obesity (IRR=.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-4.09), diabetes (IRR=1.35; 95% CI 1.07-1.71), HF (IRR=1.32; 95% CI 1.02-1.74) and VF (IRR=2.82; 95% CI 1.07-7.43) remained significant. There were no differences with regard to individual drug classes taken. However, women had fewer revascularization procedures than men (IRR=0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.98). CONCLUSION: Women were found to have more unfavorable clinical profile, higher complication rates, and underutilization of therapy, which may be influenced by socioeconomic differences between genders and lead to a differential prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myftiu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: