Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: An anaesthetic agent conserving device (ACD) has been added to a Bain system to approach the agent-saving capacity of a low flow circle system. METHODS: Randomly selected ASA physical status I patients received a standardized anaesthetic with sevoflurane in air/O2 through either a circle system with 1.5 l/min fresh gas flow (n = 8), or through a Bain system with an added ACD with fresh gas flow 4.4-6.4 l/min (n = 8). A target controlled infusion of remifentanil was used for analgesia. RESULTS: The median sevoflurane consumption was 19.7 and 22.0 ml/MAC/h with the low flow circle system and the Bain system + ACD, respectively (P=0.10, Mann-Whitney U-test), or when adjusted for weight 0.25 and 0.28 ml/MAC/h/kg (P=0.26, Mann-Whitney U-test). CONCLUSION: The expenditure of sevoflurane with a Bain system + ACD was close to that in a circle system with 1.5 l/min fresh gas flow. It is thereby possible to use sevoflurane to all its potential, performing for example rapid alterations in end-tidal concentration using high fresh gas flows by combining a Bain system with an ACD. Although the price is not decided for this not yet commercially available device, a potential for a lower cost exists. Additionally, there will be no concerns of toxic compounds produced in the absorber.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enlund et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: