Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article provides an annotated summary of 26 different procedures potentially useful in analyzing group therapy process, and includes an overview of therapeutic themes, research issues and clinical implications. The goal is to familiarize clinicians and researchers with the range of standardized and semistandardized procedures available for studying group interactions that have appeared in the literature during the past several decades. The authors concentrate on observer rating systems and do not systematically review self-report instruments. It is argued that the application of objective rating systems may foster greater understanding of group therapeutic interactions than is generally possible through normal clinical observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuhriman et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: