The integrity of anode/organic interfacial contact is shown to be crucial to the performance and stability of archetypical small molecule organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). In this contribution, vapor-deposited lipophilic, hole-transporting 1,4-bis(phenyl- m -tolylamino)biphenyl (TPD) and 1,4-bis(1-naphthylphenylamino)biphenyl (NPB) thin films are shown to undergo decohesion on ITO anode surfaces under mild heating. An effective approach to ameliorate such interfacial decohesion is introduction, via self-assembly or spin-coating, of covalently bound N( p -C 6 H 4 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 SiCl 3 ) 3 (TAA)- and 4,4‘-bis[( p -trichlorosilylpropylphenyl)phenylamino]biphenyl (TPD-Si 2 )-derived adhesion/injection layers at the anode/hole transport layer interface. The resulting angstrom-scale hole transport layers prevent decohesion of vapor-deposited hole transport layers and significantly enhance OLED hole injection fluence. OLEDs fabricated with these modified interfaces exhibit appreciably reduced turn-on voltages, considerably higher luminous intensities, and enhanced thermal robustness versus bare ITO-based control devices. Spin-coated, cross-linked TPD-Si 2 films, in particular, prove to be superior to conventional ITO functionalization interlayers, including copper phthalocyanine, in this regard. The present ITO-functionalized devices achieve maximum external forward quantum efficiencies as high as 1.2% and a luminous level of 15 000 cd/m 2 in simple ITO/interlayer/HTL/Alq/Al heterostructures. We also show that Cu(Pc) interlayers actually suppress, rather than enhance, hole injection and template crystallization of vapor-deposited TPD and NPB at modest temperatures, resulting in poor OLED thermal stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: