Why the study?
Recent debate surrounds the Sex Category criterion in the CHA2DS2-VASc score and the potential consequences of implementing the sex-less CHA2DS2-VA score for stroke risk assessment in atrial fibrillation.
Does the use of the sex-less CHA2DS2-VA score compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score alter stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does the use of the sex-less CHA2DS2-VA score compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score alter stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This narrative review highlights the methodological and clinical implications of removing the female sex criterion from stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation.
Questions utility of female sex in CHA2DS2-VASc; leaves open whether sex-agnostic scores suffice for anticoagulation decisions.
Stroke prevention is a key clinical concern in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation treatment reduces the risk of disabling stroke, but the treatment increases the risk of bleeding. For decades, the decision to initiate oral anticoagulation has been guided by clinical risk scoring systems such as the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. In this narrative review, we focus on the recent discussion of the “Sc” (Sex Category) criterion in the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Epidemiological considerations when assessing stroke rates in cohorts are discussed, and the implications of different methodological approaches are outlined. Next, we review studies investigating the association of the “Sc” criterion on the stroke rates under various approaches. Lastly, we discuss potential consequences of implementing the recently suggested sex-less CHA2DS2-VA score, which leaves out female sex from stroke risk assessment in atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: