Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the acceptable noise level in an office environment by interviewing 422 occupants about the aural environment being perceived in 61 air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong. The survey samples covered different types of building and prevalent mechanical air supply system. In particular, the measured equivalent continuous noise level L eq in the offices was chosen as an indicator and correlated with the subjective responses from occupants on a visual analogue assessment scale and a dichotomous assessment scale. The results showed that this acceptability was significantly influenced by the office noise level and it would be correlated with a logistic regression model. A satisfaction criterion of the noise level could be evaluated from the frequency distribution of the occupants’ response at certain L eq . In addition, the proposed satisfaction criterion of aural comfort in current design practice was confirmed by the survey samples: an indoor environment with an equivalent continuous noise level L eq of 57.5 dBA would be adopted as a design criterion for some offices. Practical application: The neutral criterion for aural comfort indicated by the equivalent continuous noise level L eq in air-conditioned offices was determined within the range of 45-70 dBA and the ‘optimum’ noise level L a /57.5 dBA to be maintained in an office was determined from the survey. This study provides a template for applying a statistical frequency analysis and logistic regression model to examine the ‘optimum’ criteria for aural environment indicated by equivalent continuous noise level L eq in air-conditioned offices elsewhere.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mui et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: