Why the study?
Does interaction with a psychiatric research team reduce the incidence of postcardiotomy delirium in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
Does interaction with a psychiatric research team reduce the incidence of postcardiotomy delirium in patients undergoing open-heart surgery?
Psychological factors contribute to postcardiotomy delirium, and preoperative psychiatric interaction may have a prophylactic-therapeutic effect in reducing its incidence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support preoperative psychiatric consultation to lower delirium risk; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
One hundred forty-two patients were observed through their openheart surgery experiences. Preoperative psychiatric ratings and psychological tests of personality were obtained as well as physical and operative data. Twenty-five percent developed a postcardiotomy delirium following a lucid interval and 6% an immediate organic brain syndrome apparent immediately on awakening from anesthesia. It was suggested that postcardiotomy delirium be viewed as a psychosomatic syndrome. There was evidence that beyond the influence of physical and operative variables, a high degree of psychological activity and dominance may contribute to delirium. Further, a group seen by the research team had half the delirium incidence of a comparable group not seen, suggesting that such intervention has a prophylactic-therapeutic function. Prior investigations showing a relationship between delirium and physical and operative variables were confirmed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald S. Kornfeld (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: